mirrodie wrote:
Once I posted Mat's link, a barrage of anti-NY rants began, saying how we neglected Concorde.
Mario
Old mate as far as I know i never made any anti-NY rants, but i was very upset with Intrepids attitude.
mirrodie wrote:
Yet when I brought up the logical argument, that they allowed outright graffiti on one of the AF birds, they went mum.
I agree and i think these days BA Concordes still have a much higher profile than AF ones, but what happened to an AF Concorde was almost as bad G-BOAD.
mirrodie wrote:
I have a ton of thoughts about it but it was an accident. Lets get her back to her original glory.
Youre right...... whats done is done and the past can't be changed but G-BOAD now needs to be fixed and kept safe. I hope this will include putting her engines back or if that causes an issue for Intrepid at least make fake fiberglass front and back faces to stop corrosion of the inlets.
New York is bound to have talented artists who can easily do this.
mirrodie wrote:
And can we see work on a way of persuading JFK to take her? There is tons of land where it can go and with airport security as it is, it would be protected.
thoughts?
How could we do that ?
Who owns JFK ?
Who's the chairman of JFK ?
I just heard in the UK that Intrepid are implying they don't have enough money for G-BOAD and they want us to help ........ can any one from NY shed any light on this ?