Uploading to Anet/JP? Pre-Screen Here!

**Greg_NY** · 2011-10-16, 05:52 PM

Originally Posted by JDANDO

Very nice Mike!

Can someone give me a hand on finding the cn and block number for this bad boy?

Try this website - you will find it here:
http://f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-...and-inventory/

**JDANDO** · 2011-10-16, 06:35 PM

Originally Posted by Greg_NY

Try this website - you will find it here:
http://f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-...and-inventory/

I looked there for 84-0382 when I should have been using 84-1382. Got it now!

**threeholerglory** · 2011-11-06, 08:18 PM

just got this into the queue...

**gonzalu** · 2011-11-07, 12:48 AM

I would accept solely on star value :-) That being said, Maybe a bit underexposed? Here is a quick boost in contrast, exposure and saturation. Light bands are my edit...

Good luck sir, hope it gets accepted. I am still cursing for this picture!

**JDANDO** · 2011-12-11, 09:05 AM

Good Morning NYCA!

Browsing through the HD and found a few shots from the 2010 Great MN Airshow that I might try and get into jp.net. Horrible light most of the time, but I think this one has a chance

http://jeremyd.smugmug.com/Other/pot...9_c5MdQN4-O-LB

Any editing suggestions? Also what would I use for the plane upload information? Thanks in advance.

**JDANDO** · 2011-12-30, 01:06 PM

Hey guys, what are the chances of getting this on jp.net? Unfortunately I do not have the N-number.

http://jeremyd.smugmug.com/Other/pot...0_S7p5bK6-O-LB

This previously got rejected for dark. It was shot at 2300, so it was dark outside. Bounced the flash of the roof of the flight deck which blew out the LCD screens a bit.

Re-editted and played with the shadow/highlight a bit.

http://jeremyd.smugmug.com/Other/pot...5_sNXBHJ4-O-LB

Any comments appreciated!

**Roush6NY** · 2011-12-30, 01:56 PM

Jeremy

This is too dark in my opinion

I think this should do, make SURE to check off "NIGHT SHOT" as well

**Kris V** · 2012-01-18, 08:29 PM

I am new to the JP/A-Net, and I would like someone prescreen my pics...i think I bugged enough people to double check me, so I'll give this a shot!
Was rejected because of undersharpening, is this good now?

UPS 744 hope I centered it right.

Is this one blurry?

Sorry if I over did this.

**heeshung** · 2012-01-18, 08:33 PM

#1 seems blurry and a bit off-color; I don't think any amount of sharpening could fix that.

#2 looks okay, maybe a TOUCH of USM.

#3 looks far, lacking in contrast and soft, maybe salvageable.

#4 looks pretty well exposed and pretty sharp to me, just a big of color noise, especially noticeable in the red areas, but that's okay.

#5 and #6 look good.

**Kris V** · 2012-01-18, 09:18 PM

Than you very much for the help on that, the FD MD-11 is very faded though, but your prob right.
Fixing the other ones that need fixing.

**JDANDO** · 2012-01-18, 10:23 PM

Also on #1 parts of the plane are chopped off. Not sure if they would accept that crop. Keep posting up images! I love the cargo planes!

**alevik** · 2012-01-18, 10:39 PM

Kris -

1 Fedex is soft around the nose and a bit dark. The motive/parts cut off is fine as the crop is motivated.

2 UPS 744 looks good, I would instant add (make sure CARGO checked)

3 UPS might be a touch low, but crop is technically ok as you are leaving left wing in

4 NAC I would instant add, again check CARGO

5 Alaska I would instant add

6 UPS touch low in the frame but otherwise would instant add (and again CARGO category)