Looks a bit soft all around Sergio, and due to the clouds there is very little contrast on the forward fuselage. Too bad, it's a great catch.
Looks a bit soft all around Sergio, and due to the clouds there is very little contrast on the forward fuselage. Too bad, it's a great catch.
Could i please get a critique for these pics..
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/460 ... 9c2c_o.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... 8737-1.jpg
Much appreciated... :D
Spotting Deprived Spotter...Need some spotting....
What do you think?
Doug
Well you seem like you can hold that camera steady Doug but we got to work on getting good light on your subject. Your shot is too dark and try to zoom in a tad more.
anet link is not working and the BA777s looks pretty good, front titles seem a little off but probably because the fuselage is not lit evenly. Seems level.Could i please get a critique for these pics..
'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol
This was a week before
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3057206
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3057187
I was at Lauderdale today and the weather was terrible!
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064924
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064918
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064928
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064921
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064933
any sort of tips would be much appreciated
Thanks
astrojetLiftoff
I like the two Spirit planes shot. Joe O
Thanks joe :D
astrojetLiftoff
Hi, guys! Here are a few from my JFK outing on Saturday. They're in the queue, but there are a couple I'm not convinced will make it:
Thanks, all! I'll have more images after my first round of screening, and once I'm ready to upload more images!
TIS
Antonis Panayotatos
Owner, Photographer
www.stellaryear.com
Canon 5D MkIII, Canon 7DMkII: Canon 24-70L USM II, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 85mm f/1.4ART, Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 DG OS HSM
First one looks a little over sharpened or just a bad lock on the tail. The rest though should make it but will probably get the normal BS rejection. Also American is a little dark.
http://brandonsaviationblog.blogspot.com/ My continuing updated Aviation Blog
http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawks7757/ My continuing updated photostream from BFI and sometimes SEA
Thanks!! I'll leave them in the queue, and ask some more questions about my next batch when that goes in!Originally Posted by seahawks7757
TIS
Antonis Panayotatos
Owner, Photographer
www.stellaryear.com
Canon 5D MkIII, Canon 7DMkII: Canon 24-70L USM II, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 85mm f/1.4ART, Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 DG OS HSM
The AA 767 color or WB is way off too.
'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol
According to Photoshop, in that image, white is white, and gray is gray. It's just backlit (last shot of the day at Woodmere) so it looks goofy. Haha. But it's my only shot of an AA 767 with winglets from that day, so that's the best I'm gonna get. I'm leaving it in on the off-chance a screener hits "Accept" by mistake.Originally Posted by NIKV69
TIS
Antonis Panayotatos
Owner, Photographer
www.stellaryear.com
Canon 5D MkIII, Canon 7DMkII: Canon 24-70L USM II, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 85mm f/1.4ART, Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 DG OS HSM
Thats always why it goes through 2 screenings :POriginally Posted by ANITIX87
http://brandonsaviationblog.blogspot.com/ My continuing updated Aviation Blog
http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawks7757/ My continuing updated photostream from BFI and sometimes SEA
Just submitted these two. Any thoughts?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... esized.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... esized.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... esized.jpg
any thoughts on this one? I can't seem to get the horizon level...
Bookmarks