I have a Pilot pen that looks strikingly similar to this plane!
I have a Pilot pen that looks strikingly similar to this plane!
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9
Ooh sweet. I love those long CRJ's.
I just look at that and think that:
1. A thin and long fuselage like that must buckle during any type of hard landing.
and
2. Those tiny engines make it look like the most underpowered aircraft ever. Can they really support the plane at any real payload?
Email me anytime at [email protected].
1. The pressures on landing are spread out through the fuselage to avoid such things from happening. The A346 and 773's fuselage is long and thin for their size, do they buckle on hard landings? No. While they are of course much large then this plane its relative in terms of weight. Has one CRJ-900 buckled on landing yet?Originally Posted by Phil D.
2. The size of the engines don't mean a thing you can squeeze alot of power out of small things these days. The engines on this plane produce 15,510 lbs of thrust similar to that of the E Jets.
this thing will be like a G-V on landing, you'll have to land it twice. seeing this picture only brings to mind mr. peel's "it's like flying in a tube" comment and coresponding visual aide...
it is mathematically impossible for either hummingbirds, or helicopters to fly. fortunately, neither are aware of this.
I'm sure the thrust/weight compares to other jets in its class and probably way outperforms early jetliners like the classic 737. It's also the design of the wing that affects performance. No one calls the CRJ-200 underpowered, but it takes forever to get off the ground, thanks to the lack of slats. Once it's in the air, though, it rockets upwards.Originally Posted by Phil D.
[quote=T-Bird76]1. The pressures on landing are spread out through the fuselage to avoid such things from happening. The A346 and 773's fuselage is long and thin for their size, do they buckle on hard landings? No. While they are of course much large then this plane its relative in terms of weight. Has one CRJ-900 buckled on landing yet?Originally Posted by "Phil D.":3ra71xpf
2. The size of the engines don't mean a thing you can squeeze alot of power out of small things these days. The engines on this plane produce 15,510 lbs of thrust similar to that of the E Jets.[/quote:3ra71xpf]
I know. I'm Just saying that it looks funny. I don't actually expect the planes to snap in half on windy days.
Email me anytime at [email protected].
Two things came to mind for me....
1. It looks like a tail strike waiting to happen
2. As others have said, and as it was reportedly said on a US Air flight by a flight attendant "The next time you'd like to fly through the sky on a thin tube..."
Mark Lawrence - KFLL
Davie, FL
Community Manager NYCAviation.com
email: [email protected]
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1538
https://www.flickr.com/photos/9633283@N04/
Bookmarks