The first is likely unsalvageable, unless the original includes the nose gear. Both are still unlevel.
Printable View
The first is likely unsalvageable, unless the original includes the nose gear. Both are still unlevel.
Here is one that could use presreening.
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/0/3/1...1327988130.jpg
Also check the link to see if sharp, undersharp please.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3744111
It's slightly softer towards the front, but I think it's okay.
Kris that last one looks to be soft/oversharpened which is my way of saying it was OOF or too soft to start with and was overcompensated for in post. Look at the size of the aliasing and you see what I mean. The left winglet and nose look soft still.
Hey Kris, my pleasure... these are not so great in my opinion. Subject matter and composition are fine but, overall, you have a lot of purple fringing, heat haze/distance and other issues. First off I'd like to encourage you to pre-set some settings on your camera. I notice that all the pictures have either Auto Exposure or worse, Auto Program modes used. This can cause you to have inconsistent results. Here is what I suggest you do:
--Set your camera to Aperture Priority Mode. Canon calls it Av I believe.
--Set the ISO to 200 MANUALLY. Turn OFF any Auto ISO functions. Go as low as you can on ISO given your available light.
--Turn off any features which enhance exposure after the picture is taken. Anything like Highlight Protection or Shadow Protection or the like. This can create halos.
--Set your Exposure Meter to Evaluative.
--Set your Aperture to f/8 for sunny days. Dial in - 1/3rd or 1/7th exposure compensation depending on your resulting histogram.
--Cloudy days, I would set it to f/7.1 or f/6.3 and dial in +1/3rd exposure compensation to start and check your histogram.
--Set your White Balance to Daylight or Auto (if shooting RAW) or Cloudy if overcast.
You should get consistently better photos. When shooting, keep your forehead planted hard against your eye-cup on the back of your camera and brace your elbows to your ribcage. This may be old news to you but it is always worth repeating. I also try to speak to the greater audience that reads these forums, not just you.
Now to the above:
1: Soft, Purple Fringing, High in frame, blocked wheels
2: Too contrasty, could be brighter, grainy
3: Looks ok, maybe a bit of compensation on the rear wheels ... they look pure black.
4: Poor quality, purple fringing, oversharpened, overexposed, too contrasty, heat haze.
Please do ask any questions you like about exposure, metering, etc.
Alright, some Airliners.net pre-screening sought here. I am fighting a losing battle against quality in terms of softness with this camera, however I thought I'd keep on fighting to get some JFK stuff accepted (somehow got a Cargolux 744F in today :cool:.
These are the first 3 that I am focusing on, and any input would rock!
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...74img_7306.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...16img_7446.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...15img_6758.jpg
Nick
How are these?
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg194...jpg&res=medium
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg542...jpg&res=medium
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg406...jpg&res=medium
Are they A-net/JP quality? Or just JP, or personnel collection?
Trying something a little more artistic for jp.net
Thoughts, comments? Any change to the crop?
http://jeremyd.smugmug.com/Other/pot...72n387am-L.jpg
I would crop a little tighter so the tails fill more of the frame Jeremy.
What do you think? its already in Queue..
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...img_8240_b.jpg