NLovis wrote:
T-Bird76 wrote:
Expense. They required there own MX, Training, Parts, and Support programs. The return on investement simply did not cover the expense.
Hopefully it will be different this time
But it wont be, because of the reasons Tommy outlined. It's a completely different manufacturer, airframe & engines. So even if it's new, you still need MX training, a seperate supply of parts, and a different support program.
This is fine for KLM and any other Fokker operator, they are already invested in the aircraft, but for a US carrier in these times to make that kind of investment it would be completely foolish.
Now, if it's a brand new airline, and they need those things anyway, they sure why not? But I don't see any new airlines on the horizon for the US in the near future.